COMPTROLLER LEMBO SAYS STATE ON
TRACK TO END FISCAL YEAR 2017 WITH $107.2-MILLION DEFICIT
Monday July 3, 2017 |
Contact: Tara Downes 631-834-5234 |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MONDAY, JULY 3, 2017
Comptroller Kevin Lembo today said that the state, despite mitigation efforts
– including revenue transfers and spending reductions – is still on track to
close Fiscal Year 2017 with a deficit of $107.2 million.
In a letter to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, Lembo said that the state’s Budget
Reserve Fund will be reduced to $128.38 million after closing any remaining
deficit, based on current projections.
“Long-term planning must be a priority to prepare for ongoing uncertainties
and developing trends in the national and state economies that will likely
influence future budgets as well,” Lembo said. “Those factors include a
statewide population decline and shift – as well as a plan announced by the
Federal Reserve to reduce its balance sheet by $2 trillion from the end of this
year through 2022. The Federal Reserve’s plan could cause a disruption in the
stock market, with unknown ramifications on the state and national economies.”
Lembo said Connecticut has already experienced continued revenue
deterioration from initial budget estimates in Fiscal Year 2017, most notably in
the income tax and sales tax.
“Some of the diminishment in income tax revenue from capital gains may result
from uncertainty about the possibility of federal tax changes that would lower
the capital gains rate,” Lembo said. “Investors may be reluctant to undertake
transactions that generate taxable gains in light of the potential for future
reductions in those tax liabilities.”
On the state spending side, net expenditures are estimated to be $125 million
below the budget plan, with state payroll running almost 7 percent below last
year’s level and general agency operating expenditures down by more than 11
“Connecticut’s overall budget performance is ultimately dependent upon the
performance of the national and state economies,” Lembo said.
Lembo pointed to latest economic indicators from federal and state
Departments of Labor and other sources that show:
• In Fiscal Year 2016 the withholding portion of the income tax increased 3.4
percent from the prior fiscal year. Through May of Fiscal Year 2017, these
receipts were up 1.9 percent from last year. Adjusting for timing differences
between fiscal years in deposit days by month, the withholding tax trend has
been running below last fiscal year during the second half of this fiscal year.
Withholding receipts throughout this recovery period have been running well
below the increases experienced during the last recovery, with the exception of
fiscal years that contained large tax increases.
• According to 2016 benchmark revisions by the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Connecticut lost 200 jobs in calendar year 2016. After strong
first-quarter employment growth, the employment situation in the state became
more erratic. The final quarter of 2016 posted a net loss of jobs.
• The business payroll survey showed that the state added 6,700 jobs (0.4
percent) in May 2017, to a level of 1,688,300, seasonally adjusted. The April
preliminary job loss numbers were revised downward from a loss of 1,500
positions to a loss of 3,100 jobs. Over the past 12-month period ending in May,
the state has posted 11,000 new payroll jobs. During the last period of economic
recovery, employment growth averaged over 16,000 annually.
• Connecticut has now recovered 79.0 percent (94,100, or an average of 1,082
jobs per month) of the 119,100 seasonally adjusted jobs lost in the Great
Recession (3/08-2/10). The job recovery is into its 87th month and the state
needs an additional 25,000 jobs to reach an employment expansion. At the current
job pace this will take over two years.
• Connecticut's unemployment rate for May was unchanged from last month at 4.9
percent. Nationally, the unemployment rate was 4.3 percent in May.
• All of the employment and labor force data must be considered in light of the
erosion in the state’s total population over recent years. According to U.S.
census data, Connecticut saw a decline in population of 8,278 residents between
July 1, 2015 and July 1, 2016. Connecticut was one of only eight states to
experience a decline in population during this period. Connecticut has now
posted three consecutive years of population decline.
• In June, the Census Bureau reported that the state’s population age 65 and
over grew from 14.2 percent to an estimated 16.2 percent of the total population
between 2010 and 2016. That’s an increase from about 508,000 to 577,000 people.
Nationally, the 65 and over population represented 15.3 percent of the total.
• This aging of the population has important implications for state tax revenue
because as the baby boom generation retires, the labor force participation rate
in states is expected to decline and, with it, income and spending.
• Most people earn less and spend less during retirement, suggesting that an
aging population could reduce government revenue, particularly from sales taxes
and individual income taxes. These sources of revenue make up more than 75
percent of total state government revenue in Connecticut.
• Average hourly earnings at $30.92, not seasonally adjusted, were up $0.21,
or 0.7 percent, from the May 2016 estimate ($30.71). The resultant average
Private Sector weekly pay amounted to $1,038.91, down $5.23, or 0.5 percent
below a year ago.
• The 12-month percent change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U, U.S. City Average, not seasonally adjusted) in May 2017 was
• The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that Connecticut’s personal income
grew by 3 percent between 2015 and 2016. This ranked Connecticut 33rd nationally
in 2016 income growth.
• A June 28 report from the Bureau showed Connecticut personal income increasing
at an annualized rate of 3.7 percent. This ranked Connecticut 37th nationally in
personal income growth.
• According to a June 21 report from CT Realtors, the sale of single-family
residential homes in Connecticut increased by 10 percent in May 2017 from the
same month a year earlier. The median sales price of a home also increased 4
percent from $249,900 to $260,000. The May numbers reverse the declines
experienced in April. The sale of townhouses and condominiums in the state
posted an increased by 25.4 percent in May 2017. The median price was up 3.6
percent to $170,875.
• Nationally, existing-home sales in May increased 2.7 percent from May of last
year. The median price of a home in May was $252,800.
• With mortgage rates moving up, many economists have forecasted that 2017 will
be a slower year for the housing market than 2016. Some of the strongest sales
numbers in more than a decade were seen in 2016.
• The Commerce Department reported that U.S. retail sales fell 0.3 percent in
May amid declining purchases of motor vehicles and discretionary spending after
an unrevised 0.4 percent increase in April. May's decline was the largest since
January 2016 and fell well short of economists' expectations for a 0.1 percent
gain. Department stores saw a 1-percent decline, auto saw a 0.2-percent drop,
and restaurants a 0.1-percent decline.
• Excluding automobiles, gasoline, building materials and food services, retail
sales were unchanged last month after an upwardly revised 0.6 percent rise in
April. This core retail sales number correspond most closely with the consumer
spending component of gross domestic product.
• The preliminary publication of the data for June from the University of
Michigan's Consumer Survey Center showed that consumer sentiment fell to 94.5
• The total debt held by American households reached a record high in early
2017, exceeding its 2008 peak after years of retrenchment in the face of
financial crisis, recession and modest economic growth.
• The data were not adjusted for inflation, and household debt remains below
past levels in relation to the size of the overall U.S. economy. In the first
quarter of 2017, total debt was about 67 percent of nominal gross domestic
product versus roughly 85% of GDP in the third quarter of 2008.
• Americans reduced their debts during and after the 2007-09 Recession to an
unusual extent: a 12-percent decline from the peak in the third quarter of 2008
to the trough in the second quarter of 2013. New York Fed researchers, looking
at data back to the end of World War II, described the drop as an aberration
from what had been a 63-year upward trend thus reflecting the depth, duration
and aftermath of the Great Recession.
• Americans owe over $1.4 trillion in student loan debt, spread out among about
44 million borrowers. That’s about $620 billion more than the total U.S. credit
card debt. In fact, the average Class of 2016 graduate has $37,172 in student
loan debt, up six percent from 2015. The student loan delinquency rate of 11.2
percent is high and has been growing (90+ days delinquent or in default). The
delinquency rate was below 5 percent during the last economic recovery period.
• In recent years, the personal saving rate in the United States has fallen
sharply adding an impetus for higher levels of debt financing.
Business and Economic Growth
• On May 11, the Bureau of Economic analysis released its data on GDP by
state through the fourth quarter of 2016. Between 2013 and 2016, Connecticut’s
GDP grew at an annual rate of 1 percent ranking the state 32nd nationally in
growth. Between 2015 and 2016, Connecticut’s GDP also grew at a 1-percent rate.
However, growth accelerated between the third and fourth quarters of 2016 with
annualized growth of 2 percent. The strongest contributor to GDP growth came
from the finance and insurance sector. This sector has been adding jobs
recently, but still remains 14,400 below its pre-recession payroll employment
• According to the June 29 third estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis,
real GDP in the first quarter of 2017 grew at a 1.4-percent annual rate. In the
fourth quarter of 2016 GDP grew at a 2.1-percent rate.
• The deceleration in real GDP in the first quarter reflected a downturn in
private inventory investment, a deceleration in personal consumption
expenditures, and a downturn in state and local government spending that were
partly offset by an upturn in exports, an acceleration in nonresidential fixed
investment, and a deceleration in imports.
• Corporate profits after tax with inventory valuation and capital
consumption adjustments fell at an annual rate of 2.7 percent in the first
quarter after rising at a 2.3-percent pace in the prior three months. The
Commerce Department said first-quarter profits were depressed by several legal
settlements, including federal penalties on U.S. subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank
and Credit Suisse and an environmental-regulation settlement with automaker
• From a year earlier, after-tax profits were up 4.1 percent in the first three
months of 2017.
• For all of 2016, profits rose 4.3 percent after falling 8.5 percent in 2015.
Earnings fell in 2015 as exports declined on a strengthening dollar, energy
prices and other commodity prices softened and global growth weakened. But oil
prices stabilized last year and the global outlook has brightened, helping
bolster U.S. businesses.
• New orders for key U.S.-made capital goods unexpectedly fell in May and
shipments also declined, suggesting a loss of momentum in the manufacturing
sector halfway through the second quarter.
• The Commerce Department’s June 26 report showed that overall orders for
durable goods, items ranging from toasters to aircraft that are meant to last
three years or longer, fell 1.1 percent in May, the biggest decline since
November. They dropped 0.9 percent in April.
• Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, a closely watched proxy
for business spending plans, dropped 0.2 percent in May, the largest decline
• Civilian aircraft orders declined 11.7 percent and bookings for defense
aircraft and parts plummeted 30.8 percent.
• The Markit Flash Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI) for June followed the
same trend as the durable goods data. The major findings were as follows:
• Current and future Federal Reserve policy will significantly impact the
direction of the economy. The enormous size of the Fed’s balance sheet—both real
and relative—is cause for concern. The Fed has significantly expanded its
footprint in credit markets between 2008 and 2014 to leverage economic growth.
• In response to the Great Recession, the Fed approved several unconventional
monetary policies intended to promote economic recovery. Of these policies,
"quantitative easing" (the purchase of large assets such as mortgage backed
securities and long-term Treasuries) led to the largest expansion of the Fed
balance sheet since World War II. The
• Fed has stipulated that the expansion of the balance sheet is a temporary
policy stance and that holdings will return to normal as the recovery
• For a bit of perspective, the Fed’s holdings total $4.5 trillion; the
entire commercial banking sector holds about $1.7 trillion in mortgage backed
securities and Treasuries. That’s all commercial banks’ combined holdings.
• The Federal Reserve has published a plan to reduce its balance sheet by $2
trillion from the end of 2017 through 2022.
• Going back to the 1950s, there are very few instances in which the US Federal
Reserve was a net seller of assets that did not correspond to a notable decline
in equity markets.
• It is not immediately knowable if there is enough slack in the monetary system
for the Fed to sell $2 trillion in assets and not cause a major stock market
disruption. How the Fed would react to such a disruption is also unclear. This
is a significant risk factor that will be closely watched by analysts.
• Estimated and final income tax payments account for approximately 40
percent of total state income tax receipts. Both the estimated and final
payments had a negative rate of growth in Fiscal Year 2016 and that has
continued into Fiscal Year 2017.
• Over $200 million of the drop in receipts came from the state’s closely
monitored top 100 income earners, who are the source of an outsize proportion of
the state’s revenue. Many of the state’s richest residents work for hedge funds,
which have been hurt by a downturn in the industry. The graph below illustrates
the downward pressure that hedge funds have experienced both from the
perspective of assets under management (AUM) and the total number of funds.
• According to Revenue Services, after each of the past two income-tax
increases the average tax liability for the state’s 100 wealthiest residents
increased in one year and then fell. This pattern suggests those wealthy
residents either adjusted their tax strategies or earned less money in the down
• Despite the population loss and tax increases, data from the Department of
Revenue Services shows the number of full-time Connecticut tax filers with
income of $1 million or more grew to 11,223 in 2015, a 21-percent increase from
2011. The department says fewer than five of its top 100 taxpayers have fallen
out of the ranking since 2014.
• It now appears that estimated and final income tax payments will be about 8
percent below the level attained in Fiscal Year 2016.
• Shifts in equity portfolio allocations following the presidential election
and a run-up in equity values have not resulted capital gains related revenue
increases for the state.
• Some of the diminishment in revenue from capital gains may be attributed to
the increasing use by investors of tax-advantaged vehicles such as Exchange
Traded Funds (ETF). The increase in these investments is shown in the graph
below. Investors may also be awaiting federal tax reform legislation before
engaing in large scale selling of equity positions.
download release as a PDF