Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2011
Note 14 Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
The State sponsors two defined benefit OPEB plans: the State Employee OPEB Plan (SEOPEBP) and the Retired Teacher Healthcare Plan (RTHP). SEOPEBP is administered by the State Comptroller (Healthcare Policy and Benefit Division), and RTHP is administered by the Teachers' Retirement Board. None of these plans issues stand-alone financial statements. However, financial statements for these plans are presented in Note No. 15.
State Employee OPEB Plan
Plan Description
SEOPEBP is a single-employer defined benefit OPEB plan that covers retired
employees of the State who are receiving benefits from any State-sponsored
retirement system, except the Teachers' Retirement System and the Municipal
Employees' Retirement System. The plan provides healthcare and life insurance
benefits to eligible retirees and their spouses. Plan benefits, required
contributions of plan participants and the State, and other plan provisions are
described in Sections 5-257 and 5-259 of the General Statutes.
Plan Funding
The contribution requirements of the plan members and the State are established
and may be amended by the State legislature, or by agreement between the State
and employees unions, upon approval by the State legislature. The cost of
providing plan benefits is financed approximately 100 percent by the State on a
pay-as-you-go basis through an annual appropriation in the General fund.
Administrative costs of the plan are financed by the State.
As of June 30, 2011, the last actuarial valuation for the plan was dated April 1, 2008. This valuation disclosed that the plan had an unfunded accrued liability of $26.6 billion as of that date. Because of the date of the actuarial valuation, required disclosures for the plan on funded status, funding progress, and actuarial methods and assumptions could not be made in this note.
Retired Teacher Healthcare Plan
Plan Description
RTHP is a single-employer defined benefit OPEB plan that covers retired teachers
and administrators of public schools in the State who are receiving benefits
from the Teachers' Retirement System. The plan provides healthcare insurance
benefits to eligible retirees and their spouses. Plan benefits, required
contributions of plan participants and the State, and other plan provisions are
described in Section 10-183 of the General Statutes. As of June 30, 2010 (date
of the latest actuarial valuation), the plan had 33,151 retirees and
beneficiaries receiving benefits.
Plan Funding
The contribution requirements of plan members and the State are established and
may be amended by the State legislature. The cost of providing plan benefits is
financed on a pay-as-you-go basis as follows: active teachers pay for one third
of plan costs through a contribution of 1.25 percent of their annual salaries,
retired teachers pay for one third of plan costs through monthly premiums, and
the State pays for one third of plan costs through an annual appropriation in
the General Fund. Administrative costs of the plan are financed by the State.
Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation
The State's annual OPEB cost and the net OPEB obligation for each plan for the
current fiscal year were as follows (amounts in thousands):
| SEOPEBP | ||
|---|---|---|
| (6-30-10) | RTHP | |
| Annual Required Contribution | $2,145,724 | $177,063 |
| Interest on Net OPEB Obligation | 12,719 | 1,394 |
| Adjustment to Annual Required Contribution | 191,220 | (11,089) |
| Annual OPEB Cost | 2,349,663 | 167,368 |
| Contributions Made | 555,131 | 5,312 |
| Increase in net OPEB Obligation | 1,794,532 | 162,056 |
| Net OPEB Obligation - Beginning of Year | 2,356,334 | 289,837 |
| Net OPEB Obligation - End of Year | $4,150,866 | $451,893 |
In addition, other related information for each plan for the past three fiscal years was as follows:
| Annual | Percentage of | Net | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal | OPEB | Annual OPEB | OPEB | |
| Year | Cost | Cost Contributed | Obligation | |
| SEOPEBP | 2010 | $2,349,663 | 23.6% | $4,150,866 |
| 2009 | $1,669,321 | 27.1% | $2,356,334 | |
| 2008 | $1,602,739 | 28.9% | $1,139,042 | |
| RTHP | 2011 | $167,368 | 3.2% | $451,893 |
| 2010 | $115,321 | 10.5% | $289,837 | |
| 2009 | $113,704 | 19.7% | $186,624 |
Funded Status and Funding Progress
The following is funded status information for the RTHP as of June 30, 2010,
date of the latest actuarial valuation (amounts in million):
| Actuarial | Actuarial | Unfunded | UAAL as a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value of | Accrued | AAL | Funded | Covered | Percentage of | |
| Assets | Liability (AAL) | (UAAL) | Ratio | Payroll | Covered Payroll | |
| (a) | (b) | (b-a) | (a/b) | (c) | ((b-a)/c) | |
| RTHP | $0 | $2,997.8 | $2,997.8 | 0.0% | $3,646.0 | 82.2% |
Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding in progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, present multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits.
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the
substantive plan (the plan as understood by the State and the plan members) and
include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the
historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the State and plan
members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include
techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in
actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with
the long-term perspective of the calculations. Significant methods and
assumptions were as follows:
| RTHP | |
|---|---|
| Actuarial Valuation Date | 6-30-2010 |
| Actuarial Cost Method | Individual Entry Age |
| Amortization Method | Level Percent Open |
| Remaining Amortization Period | 29 Years |
| Asset Valuation Method | n/a |
| Actuarial Assumptions: | |
| Investment Rate of Return | 4.50% |
| Projected Salary Increases | 4.0%-7.5% |
| Healthcare Inflation Rate | 9% Initial, 5% Ultimate |
Other OPEB Plan
The State acts solely as the administrator and custodian of the assets of the
Policemen and Firemen Survivors' Benefit Fund (PFSBF). The State makes no
contribution to and has only a fiduciary responsibility for this fund. The fund
does not issue stand-alone financial statements. However, financial statements
for this fund are presented in Note No. 15.
Plan Description
PFSBF is a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit OPEB plan that covers
policemen and firemen of participating municipalities in the State. As of
6/30/10 there were 8 municipalities participating in the plan with a total
membership of 610 active members. The plan provides survivor benefits upon the
death of an active or retired member of the fund to his spouse and dependent
children. Plan benefits, contribution requirements of plan members and
participant municipalities, and other plan provisions are described in Sections
7-323a to 7-323i of the General Statutes.
Contributions
Plan members are required to contribute one percent of their annual salary.
Participating municipalities are required to contribute at an actuarially
determined rate. Administrative costs of the plan are financed by participating
municipalities.