Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Required Supplementary Information Schedules of Funding Progress

State of Connecticut

Required Supplementary Information
Schedules of Funding Progress
(Expressed in Millions)
(a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c) ((b-a)/c)
Actuarial Actuarial Unfunded UAAL 
as a
Valuation Value
 of
Actuarial
Accrued
AAL Funded Covered Percentage 
of
Date Assets Liability
  (AAL)
(UAAL) Ratio Payroll Covered 
Payroll
SERS            
6/30/1998 $5,669.9 $9,592.4 $3,922.5 59.1% $2,339.0 167.7%
6/30/1999* - - - - - -
6/30/2000 $7,196.0 $11,512.1 $4,316.1 62.5% $2,651.9 162.8%
6/30/2001 $7,638.9 $12,105.4 $4,466.5 63.1% $2,784.5 160.4%
6/30/2002 $7,893.7 $12,806.1 $4,912.4 61.6% $2,852.1 172.2%
6/30/2003 - - - - - -
*No actuarial valuations were performed as of June 30, 1999 and June 30, 2003            
             
TRS            
6/30/1998 $7,721.1 $10,970.1 $3,249.0 70.4% $2,298.9 141.3%
6/30/1999* - - - - - -
6/30/2000 $9,605.9 $11,797.6 $2,191.7 81.4% $2,501.5 87.6%
6/30/2001* - - - - - -
6/30/2002 $10,387.3 $13,679.9 $3,292.6 75.9% $2,698.3 122.0%
6/30/2003* - - - - - -
*No actuarial valuations were performed as of June 30, 1999, 2001 and 2003            
             
JRS            
6/30/1998 $98.1 $168.1 $70.0 58.4% $21.2 330.2%
6/30/1999 $110.7 $172.5 $61.8 64.2% $21.9 282.2%
6/30/2000 $123.4 $181.7 $58.3 67.9% $24.1 241.9%
6/30/2001 $133.1 $193.8 $60.7 68.7% $26.3 230.8%
6/30/2002 $138.4 $209.4 $71.0 66.1% $28.9 245.7%
6/30/2003* - - - - - -
*No actuarial valuation was performed as of June 30, 2003            
             
MERS            
6/30/1997 $872.0 $731.1 $(140.9) 119.3% $246.0 (57.3)%
6/30/1998 $980.4 $814.1 $(166.3) 120.4% $258.2 (64.4)%
6/30/1999 $1,100.7 $860.1 $(240.6) 128.0% $269.4 (89.3)%
6/30/2000 $1,251.6 $1,153.2 $(98.4) 108.5% $290.3 (33.9)%
6/30/2001 $1,353.1 $1,238.1 $(115.0) 109.3% $311.2 (37.0)%
6/30/2002 $1,403.4 $1,319.7 $(83.7) 106.3% $321.8 (26.0)%
             

PJRS

For the Probate Judges Retirement System because the UAAL is zero, the actuarial cost method becomes the aggregate cost method and a schedule of funding progress is not required.